Our services
People Report
Social reporting under CSRD covers your workforce, your supply chain workers, affected communities, and consumers. Four ESRS standards, dozens of indicators, and the most personal data your company will ever disclose.

Social reporting under the CSRD requires companies to disclose their performance on the social pillar of ESG through four ESRS standards. ESRS S1 covers your own workforce: working conditions, pay equity, health and safety, training, social dialogue, work-life balance, diversity. ESRS S2 covers workers in your value chain: labor rights, working conditions, grievance mechanisms. ESRS S3 covers affected communities: economic and social impacts, land rights, local development. ESRS S4 covers consumers: product safety, data privacy, accessibility.
Each standard requires both narrative disclosure (policies, processes, actions) and quantitative metrics (indicators with defined methodologies). The data must be auditable. Sources must be documented. Claims must be verifiable.
Social reporting is where CSRD gets personal. Employees can read the report and compare disclosed data against their own experience. Pay gap figures, diversity ratios, and safety statistics are verifiable by the people they describe. This creates a level of scrutiny that environmental reporting does not face.
Data complexity is the first challenge. Social metrics span multiple systems: HR databases, payroll, health and safety records, training logs, supplier assessments, community engagement records. Aggregating this data into consistent, auditable indicators requires careful design.
Privacy constraints are the second. Social data often involves personal information: pay data by demographic group, health records, union membership. GDPR and national privacy laws constrain how this data is collected, processed, and disclosed. The reporting framework must be privacy-compliant by design.
Stakeholder sensitivity is the third. Employees and unions read social disclosures carefully. If disclosed pay gap data contradicts employee experience, trust erodes. If safety statistics do not match incident reports, credibility suffers. Accuracy and transparency are not just regulatory requirements. They are relationship requirements.
Methodological maturity is the fourth. Social indicators are less standardized than environmental ones. How do you measure inclusion? How do you assess living wages across geographies? How do you quantify community impact? The methodological choices you make will be audited. Getting them right from the start avoids corrections later.
We build social reporting capability across all four ESRS S standards.
Phase 1: Materiality and scope. We assess which ESRS S standards and specific disclosure requirements are material to your company. Not every company needs to report on all four. We define the scope based on your double materiality assessment.
Phase 2: Indicator framework. We select and define the social indicators that apply: workforce demographics, pay equity metrics, safety statistics, training hours, social dialogue coverage, supply chain labor assessment scores, community impact measures. Each indicator has a defined methodology, data source, and collection frequency.
Phase 3: Data collection system. We design the data collection process: which systems feed which indicators, who is responsible for data quality, how privacy requirements are met. We work with HR, operations, procurement, and legal to build collection routines that are sustainable and GDPR-compliant.
Phase 4: Report production and audit preparation. We draft the ESRS S disclosures: narrative sections, quantitative tables, methodology notes. We prepare the audit file with data trails, source documentation, and methodology justifications.

Companies producing their first CSRD report where social topics are material. The social pillar is typically the section with the most fragmented data and the most sensitive stakeholder dynamics. Starting early and building the right framework prevents year-one mistakes.
Organizations with large workforces where ESRS S1 is the most data-intensive standard. Pay equity analysis, diversity reporting, health and safety metrics, and social dialogue disclosure all require structured data from multiple sources.
Companies with complex supply chains where ESRS S2 is material. Value chain worker data is the hardest to collect. Building the supplier data infrastructure early gives you time to fill gaps.
Businesses with operations affecting local communities (ESRS S3) or consumer-facing products (ESRS S4). Each has specific disclosure requirements that need dedicated methodology.
Social reporting is where data sensitivity is highest and stakeholder scrutiny is most direct. We build frameworks that are accurate, privacy-compliant, and defensible to both auditors and employees.
We prioritize data quality over data quantity. A small set of well-documented, auditable indicators is more valuable than a comprehensive set of unreliable ones. We design for year-over-year improvement: start with what you can measure well, and expand as data infrastructure matures.
Typical engagement: 6 to 10 weeks. Deliverables include the indicator framework, data collection system, privacy compliance review, ESRS S disclosures, and audit preparation file.

